Experimental Test of the Dynamic Droplet Model

Wonica, Dennis; Swinney, Harry L.; Cummins, H. Z.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.66

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This quantity was expressed by n, the 257 indicate that this correlation function is exponential within the limits of our experimental uncertainty. This result is corroboration of the result of Wonica et al (1976) who measured the scattered-light correlation function of xenon.…”

Section: In Oursupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Our first concern was to check the shape of the light-scattered correlation function of the Rayleigh line. The dynamic droplet model predicts a large nonexponentiality of K 2/K 2-0.15 independent of T-TC 1 (Wonica et al, 1976). We found for the range 6.3'C>T-Tc>Bm'C the spectra were all very exponential having a second cumulant K /K 2<0.03.…”

Section: Comparison Of the Rayleigh Linewidth Datamentioning

confidence: 60%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Polarized and depolarized light-scattering studies on Brownian diffusional and critical fluid systems: theory and experiment

Sorensen¹

1976

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

show abstract

Section: In Oursupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Comparison Of the Rayleigh Linewidth Datamentioning

confidence: 60%