2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental testing of phase change materials in a warm-summer humid continental climate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the present studies focus on the application of PCMs in a hot climate [62]. However, the utilization of PCMs in mild climate regions is also associated with several benefits that need to be assessed [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the present studies focus on the application of PCMs in a hot climate [62]. However, the utilization of PCMs in mild climate regions is also associated with several benefits that need to be assessed [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, substantial differences in the PCM effectivity application in Chicago, Los, Angeles, Miami, and Phoenix highlighted divergent temperature fluctuations, especially during the summer and winter periods. Notwithstanding this, the lack of studies focused on the effectivity of PCM solution in mild climate limits a broader material application [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyper isolating envelopes, improper thermal mass, solar radiation, heating transmission loads, low density or specific heat, misuse of the design standard, lack of a proper thermal behaviour work plan, inappropriate optimal insulation thickness decisions and insufficient conventional control systems all have the potential to adversely affect thermal comfort management, thus resulting in degraded quality of the superficial mass and the value of internal areal heat capacity performance (Baglivo et al , 2017). Furthermore, other common issues in thermal comfort management noted by Wang et al (2015) and Sinka et al (2019) are as follows:Critical/loss of PC condition;Design of material and chemical composition (i.e. density and thermal conductivity);Inconsistent heat exchanger inspection;Inconsistent retrofit program;Lack of standardised technical directives;Subsequent phase change material (PCM) chosen for large thermal energy storage;Handling capacity of heavy load bearing components;Selection of type of ventilation or cooling system;Occupant evaluation criteria;Poor energy saving culture; andManagement of dynamic thermal risk from the relationship between designers and manufacturers.…”
Section: Thermal Comfort In Pc Building Construction Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyper isolating envelopes, improper thermal mass, solar radiation, heating transmission loads, low density or specific heat, misuse of the design standard, lack of a proper thermal behaviour work plan, inappropriate optimal insulation thickness decisions and insufficient conventional control systems all have the potential to adversely affect thermal comfort management, thus resulting in degraded quality of the superficial mass and the value of internal areal heat capacity performance (Baglivo et al, 2017). Furthermore, other common issues in thermal comfort management noted by Wang et al (2015) and Sinka et al (2019) are as follows:…”
Section: Thermal Comfort In Pc Building Construction Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The building and construction sector is the greatest energy-consuming sector [1] with a great share of the primary energy supply deriving from fossil fuels [2]. It represents more than 30% of the world's energy consumption and nearly 40% of the total energy-related CO 2 emissions [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%