2014
DOI: 10.1364/josab.31.000742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental verification of the Breit–Rabi formula in the case of clock transition by using the spectroscopy method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular the experimental value (34) compared to the κ calculated with the Breit-Rabi formula is in excellent agreement with standard measurements [23,24]. Putting κ in natural units then the dimensions of κ are κ ∼ (length) 3 , and replacing (34) we find…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In particular the experimental value (34) compared to the κ calculated with the Breit-Rabi formula is in excellent agreement with standard measurements [23,24]. Putting κ in natural units then the dimensions of κ are κ ∼ (length) 3 , and replacing (34) we find…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…This method does not require microwave or radio frequency sources to drive Zeeman or hyperfine transitions for magnetic field calibration. Even if such sources are implemented in a setup, a reasonable guess of what the field value is makes it useful for more precise stray field cancellation methods based on driving rf/microwave or Raman transitions [35], which is usually much more time consuming. Since D1-line gray molasses cooling has been already demonstrated for all commonly laser-cooled alkali atoms, the present method could be appealing to many research groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [129] measured the quadratic Zeeman coefficient of 87 Rb clock transition by using the Ramsey atom interferometer with an uncertainty of less than 1 Hz/G 2 , and they experimentally verified the Breit-Rabi formula. [130] Zhou et al [131] measured magnetic field gradient with an atom interferometer, the resolution of 90-s integration time is 300 pT/mm. Hu et al [132] demonstrated a differential method to reject the common-mode noise and to improve the measurement resolution of magnetic field gradient by two simultaneously operated atom interferometers.…”
Section: Other Precision Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%