2021
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and Monte Carlo simulations on multiple Coulomb scattering of protons

Abstract: Background and purpose: Monte Carlo simulations as well as analytical computations of proton transport in material media require accurate values of multiple Coulomb scattering (MCS) angles. High-quality experimental data on MCS angles in the energy range for proton therapy are, however, sparse. In this work MCS modeling in proton transport was evaluated employing an experimental method to measure these angles on a medical proton beamline in clinically relevant materials. Results are compared to Monte Carlo sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TOPAS was chosen in this study, as it is capable of calculating the dose distribution, including the aura consisting of neutrons and gammas ( 25 , 35 ). Moreover, it was shown that TOPAS is able to simulate multiple Coulomb scattering in the lucite RS used in the present work with sufficient accuracy ( 26 ). As a first verification step of the MC framework, the in-field dose distribution was compared to RayStation, showing an excellent agreement in the 3D global gamma test as shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TOPAS was chosen in this study, as it is capable of calculating the dose distribution, including the aura consisting of neutrons and gammas ( 25 , 35 ). Moreover, it was shown that TOPAS is able to simulate multiple Coulomb scattering in the lucite RS used in the present work with sufficient accuracy ( 26 ). As a first verification step of the MC framework, the in-field dose distribution was compared to RayStation, showing an excellent agreement in the 3D global gamma test as shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The protons started 50 cm upstream of the isocenter at the nozzle exit of the treatment head. The Fermi–Eyges parameters were back-projected in vacuum to the nozzle exit ( 24 – 26 ). The method of ( 27 ) was applied to obtain the spot positions of the protons, taking into account the deflection of the protons at the two foci from the scanning magnets of the pencil beam dedicated nozzle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the experimental uncertainties, the maximum statistical uncertainty of the scored charge with the extrapolation IC yielded 0.9%. The other experimental uncertainties concerned the determination of the WED: Facility‐dependent uncertainties resulting in energy fluctuations of 0.05 MeV 29 corresponded to 0.08 mm range in water for 120 MeV protons (NIST) 32 . There was also an uncertainty in the physical thickness of the absorber materials used, which affected the resulting WED.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same material composition of the aluminum alloy was used as for the measurements, with a density of 2.66 g/cnormalm3 29 . The composition of RW3 as specified above resulted in a density of 1.045 g/cnormalm3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation