2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013874816509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments On Buoyant Plume Dispersion In A Laboratory Convection Tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
48
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
11
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3c. Our results agree generally with all the previous studies and are in good agreement with the water-tank experiment by Weil et al (2002). The results show that i c decreases rapidly with distance from the source and reaches an asymptotic limit of about 0.35.…”
Section: ) Concentration Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3c. Our results agree generally with all the previous studies and are in good agreement with the water-tank experiment by Weil et al (2002). The results show that i c decreases rapidly with distance from the source and reaches an asymptotic limit of about 0.35.…”
Section: ) Concentration Fluctuationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Figure 3b shows the contour of i c in the horizontal plume centerline ( y/z i ϭ 0). The LES results agree with previous experimental and numerical studies (Deardorff and Willis 1984;Luhar et al 2000;Weil et al 2002). As expected, the concentration fluctuation is larger at the edges of the plume, and it has the smallest values near the plume centroid.…”
Section: Skewnesssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is most commonly used in field experiments, with surface or aircraft platforms (Briggs 1993;Lenschow and Stankov 1986), as well as in laboratory experiments Deardorff 1976, 1981;Weil et al 2002) or Eulerian numerical models (Lamb 1978;Henn and Sykes 1992;Mason 1992). In the Lagrangian framework, the statistical properties are calculated in a reference frame that moves with the flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, the PDF results show more exponential-like distributions at the plume edge, particularly the lower edge, than in the plume centre. The intermittency, I, is small at the plume centre at x/H = 0.1, which favours clipped-Gaussian-like forms, but is much larger at the edges, favouring exponential forms [6,7,40,41].…”
Section: Intermittency Of the Concentration Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 97%