2020
DOI: 10.11336/jjcrs.11.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explanatory variables to use in a multiple regression analysis to predict stroke patients' motor FIM score at discharge from convalescent rehabilitation wards: an investigation of patients with a motor FIM score of less than 40 points at admission

Abstract: Tokunaga M, Sannomiya K. Explanatory variables to use in a multiple regression analysis to predict stroke patients' motor FIM score at discharge from convalescent rehabilitation wards: an investigation of patients with a motor FIM score of less than 40 points at admission. Jpn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, m-FIM score and c-FIM score on admission were also reported to be predictors of the FIM score at discharge related to the performance index score (Tokunaga & Sannomiya, 2020), however in the present study, the effects of m-FIM score and c-FIM score on admission were lower, suggesting that the results of this study may differ from those of this report. In addition to the fact that the FIM score at discharge was not validated as the dependent variable in this study, there may have been a difference in the inclusion of critically ill patients.…”
Section: M-fim Score and C-fim Score On Admissioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, m-FIM score and c-FIM score on admission were also reported to be predictors of the FIM score at discharge related to the performance index score (Tokunaga & Sannomiya, 2020), however in the present study, the effects of m-FIM score and c-FIM score on admission were lower, suggesting that the results of this study may differ from those of this report. In addition to the fact that the FIM score at discharge was not validated as the dependent variable in this study, there may have been a difference in the inclusion of critically ill patients.…”
Section: M-fim Score and C-fim Score On Admissioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the four types of cerebrovascular disorders used in this study, the majority of patients were System 1 or 2. Various measures of cognition have been cited as important variables reflected in the FIM at discharge (Hiragami et al, 2019, Maruyama & Hitomi, 2019, Tokunaga & Sannomiya, 2020. The reason cerebrovascular disease was not listed as a significant independent variable in this study may be due to the small number of System 3 patients with higher brain dysfunction.…”
Section: Cerebrovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 76%