2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of rapid acidification phenomena of food waste in reducing the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of high rate anaerobic digester without conceding on biogas yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to other processes, anaerobic digestion has the advantages of adapting to different work scales, treating a wider range of substrates, even with high or low moisture and impurities content [ 9 ], resulting in low environmental impacts [ 10 ] producing material able to be used as biofertilizers [ 11 ] and having high energy recovery potential [ [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to other processes, anaerobic digestion has the advantages of adapting to different work scales, treating a wider range of substrates, even with high or low moisture and impurities content [ 9 ], resulting in low environmental impacts [ 10 ] producing material able to be used as biofertilizers [ 11 ] and having high energy recovery potential [ [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that food waste (FW) is a high moisture content and easily biodegradable biomass, and bioconversion process is a mainstream method to minimize waste and realize bioenergy recovery simultaneously (Chen et al, 2017;Karmee, 2016;Kuruti et al, 2017). In 2012, over 1.6 billion tons of FW was generated worldwide (Ma et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except on weekends, the reactors received different mixtures of organic wastes twice per day. The hydraulic retention time (HRT) was maintained for 30 days (Kuruti et al 2017) and the OLR ranged between 2.0 and 3.6 kg VS/m 3 .d with a stepwise of 0.4. Each tested set of parameters was performed in duplicate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to economic viability, treatment performance as well as process capacity to manage different kinds of biowaste, anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD) seems to be the most advantageous solution relieving several environmental and energic concerns. As FW mono-digestion is often prone to acidi cation, ammonia and long chain fatty acids inhibition, the selection of suitable co-substrates is considered a key factor enhancing the stability of the process (Kuruti et al 2017, Sindhu et al 2019. In general, the choice of co-substrates for FW anaerobic treatment is done referring to their high buffering capacity, capacity on C:N ratio regulation and the broad range of nutrients required by the methanogens, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%