“…Twenty-five studies were excluded for the following reasons: 10 investigations were focused on disabled TT players, for 7 articles it was not possible to distinguish TT players from other athletes (data is aggregated and not broken down for single-sport discipline), 3 studies did not meet the PECOS criteria (being focused on illnesses and not on sports-related injuries), 2 were not pertinent to the review question, 1 study was an expert opinion article, a further study contained little information, and finally, 1 investigation was a clinical commentary. A total of 41 studies [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ] were included in the present review ( Table 2 and Table 3 ).…”