2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4533-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring association between statin use and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis

Abstract: Our results suggest that there is no association between statin use and breast cancer risk. However, observational studies cannot clarify whether the observed epidemiologic association is a causal effect or the result of some unmeasured confounding variable. Therefore, more research is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the disease incidence was low in the cohort studies, we regarded ORs as close approximations of summary RR and combined them, resulting in a common estimate of RR [14,16]. Risk estimates > 1 indicate an increased risk of the defined outcome, and risk estimates < 1 indicate a decreased risk of the defined outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the disease incidence was low in the cohort studies, we regarded ORs as close approximations of summary RR and combined them, resulting in a common estimate of RR [14,16]. Risk estimates > 1 indicate an increased risk of the defined outcome, and risk estimates < 1 indicate a decreased risk of the defined outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and H.-C.Y.) who are experts in drug and disease relationship research [13,[15][16][17][18]. The relevant electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus) were searched for articles published between January 1, 1990 and November 1, 2017, which reported the possible association between psoriasis and MS risk.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the impact of statins on dementia risk reduction remains the subject of an ongoing debate, an updated meta-analysis with a broadened capacity for testing hypotheses can potentially yield more robust estimates [15,16]. Large number of studies with incidence cases might strengthen the statistical power of meta-analysis to evaluate the magnitude of the association between exposure and outcome risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of cholesterol storage machinery may decrease cellular proliferation in breast cancer [8]. Nevertheless, observational studies have reported contradictory associations between circulating lipids and breast cancer risk [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, a recent Mendelian randomization study has shown a causal and direct association between raised LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the risk of breast cancer [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%