Exploring bidirectional couple violence in a clinical sample of female alcoholics.

Drapkin, Michelle; McCrady, Barbara S.; Swingle, Janine M; Epstein, Elizabeth E.

doi:10.15288/jsa.2005.66.213

Cited by 41 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These fi ndings are in line with considerable evidence from male samples in demonstrating a link between heavy drinking and alcohol problems with IPV (Foran and O'Leary, 2008). However, fi ndings for women in SUD treatment have been mixed, with some (Drapkin et al, 2005) but not others (Chase et al, 2003;Chermack et al, 2001) showing a relationship between women's heavy drinking and their perpetration of IPV. In addition, only two studies of women with SUDs have examined male partner heavy drinking, with neither fi nding a signifi cant association between male partners' heavy drinking and their IPV perpetration (Chase et al, 2003;Drapkin et al, 2005).…”

supporting

confidence: 81%

“…In various independent studies, women's past-year prevalence of physical IPV victimization, as reported at the outset of SUD treatment, was in the 50%-65% range (Burnette et al, 2008;Chase et al, 2003;Chermack et al, 2001;Drapkin et al, 2005). These studies also found that about two thirds of women entering SUD treatment had perpetrated physical IPV toward their partners within the past year.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Test of a Conceptual Model of Partner Aggression Among Women Entering Substance Use Disorder Treatment

Schumm

O’Farrell²,

Murphy³

et al. 2011

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: Despite extensive intimate partner violence (IPV) among women in substance use disorder treatment, few studies have investigated IPV risk factors within this population. Conceptual models, which have received support in other populations, propose that antisociality and generalized violence, alcohol and drug use, and relationship adjustment may be interrelated pathways that infl uence IPV. The purpose of this study was to test a conceptual model that integrates these individual and relationship pathways to explain IPV among women entering substance use disorder treatment. Method: Women entering substance use disorder treatment (N = 277) who had a male relationship partner completed measures of the following domains about themselves and their male partners: antisociality/generalized violence, heavy alcohol use, drug use, relationship adjustment, and psychological and physical IPV. Results: Structural equation modeling analyses showed that the antisociality/generalized violence of each partner had direct and indirect effects on IPV. Each partner's antisociality/generalized violence was directly related to her or his physical IPV. Female antisociality/ generalized violence was indirectly related to female physical IPV via female drug use and female psychological IPV. Male antisociality/generalized violence was indirectly associated with male physical IPV via male drinking, relationship adjustment, and male psychological IPV. A reciprocal relationship was found between partners' psychological IPV but not physical IPV. When accounting for other individual and relational IPV predictors, male partners' physical IPV infl uenced women's physical IPV, but women's physical IPV did not infl uence their male partner's physical IPV. Conclusions: Both partners' antisociality/generalized violence, substance use, and overall relationship adjustment are important in understanding IPV among women entering substance use disorder treatment. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 72, 933-942, 2011)

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 81%

mentioning

confidence: 95%

Test of a Conceptual Model of Partner Aggression Among Women Entering Substance Use Disorder Treatment

Schumm

O’Farrell²,

Murphy³

et al. 2011

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Partner education is also linked to aggression: Having a partner with less than a high school education is associated with bidirectional violence compared to nonviolence and perpetration only, whereas being in a relationship with a partner with 4 or more years of college was a protective factor from both bidirectional violence and perpetration only compared to no violence. Individuals with lower educational attainment are more likely to perpetrate IPV (Drapkin et al, 2005;Stets & Straus, 1990) and if one or both partners have lower educational levels, this will perhaps increase the likelihood of relationship violence.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Substance use has also been linked to IPV in both general population and clinical samples Drapkin, McCrady, Swingle, & Epstein, 2005;Lipsky et al, 2005). Although some researchers find no differences between mutually violent and perpetrator or victim-only couples in terms of alcohol use (Caetano et al, 2008;Lewis et al, 2002), others report that drinking is a risk factor for bidirectional violence.…”

Section: Substance Usementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, Weston, Temple, and Marshall (2005) found that African American women in mutually violent relationships experienced significantly more sexual and physical violence than their Euro-American and Mexican American counterparts. Finally, those with lower socioeconomic attainment, as measured by the educational level of the respondents (Drapkin et al, 2005;Frias & Angel, 2005), their parents (Foshee et al, 2008), or their partners (Brown & Bulanda, 2008), are at increased risk for partner violence. Johnson (1995Johnson ( , 2006) created a typology of violent couples that has been used by other social science researchers to provide context to contradictory findings in the dating violence litera-ture (Anderson, 2002;Prospero, 2008).…”

Section: Demographic Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bidirectional, Unidirectional, and Nonviolence: A Comparison of the Predictors Among Partnered Young Adults

Melander¹,

Noel²,

Tyler³

2010

Violence Vict

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to more fully understand the context and impact of intimate partner violence (IPV), it is important to make distinctions between different types of relationship aggression. As such, the current study longitudinally examines the differential effects of childhood, adolescent, and demographic factors on three different partner violence groups: those who experience bidirectional IPV, those who experience unidirectional IPV, and those who do not experience either form of IPV. Multinomial logistic regression results reveal that depressive symptoms and lower partner education predict bidirectional when compared to unidirectional IPV and nonviolence. In contrast, other risk factors such as illicit drug use are found to be predictors of unidirectional violence only, which reveals that the correlates of violence vary depending upon the type of IPV examined.

show abstract

Behandlung von riskantem, schädlichem und abhängigem Alkoholgebrauch

Kiefer

Hoffmann²,

Arens

et al. 2022

S3-Leitlinie Screening, Diagnose Und Behandlung Alkoholbezogener Störungen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring bidirectional couple violence in a clinical sample of female alcoholics.

Cited by 41 publications

References 24 publications

Test of a Conceptual Model of Partner Aggression Among Women Entering Substance Use Disorder Treatment

Test of a Conceptual Model of Partner Aggression Among Women Entering Substance Use Disorder Treatment

Bidirectional, Unidirectional, and Nonviolence: A Comparison of the Predictors Among Partnered Young Adults

Behandlung von riskantem, schädlichem und abhängigem Alkoholgebrauch

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About