Exploring factors associated with the uneven utilization of telemedicine in Norway: a mixed methods study

Abstract

BackgroundNorway has a long history of using telemedicine, especially for geographical reasons. Despite the availability of promising telemedicine applications and the implementation of national initiatives and policies, the sustainability and scaling-up of telemedicine in the health system is still far from accomplished. The main objective of this study was to explore and identify the multi-level (micro, meso and macro) factors affecting telemedicine utilization in Norway.MethodsWe used a mixed methods approach. Data from a national registry were collected to analyze the use of outpatient visits and telemedicine contacts in Norway from 2009 to 2015. Interviews with key stakeholders at national, regional and local level helped complete and contextualize the data analysis and explore the main issues affecting the use of telemedicine by health authorities and hospitals. Relevant national documents were also used to support, contradict, contextualize or clarify information and data.ResultsTelemedicine use in Norway from 2009 to 2015 remained very low, not exceeding 0.5% of total outpatient activity at regional level and 0.1% at national level. All four regions used telemedicine. Of the 29 hospitals, 24 used it at least once over the 7-year period. Telemedicine was not used regularly everywhere, with some hospitals using it sporadically. Telemedicine was mostly used in selected specialties, including rehabilitation, neurosurgery, skin and venereal diseases. Three major themes affecting implementation and utilization of telemedicine in Norway emerged: (i) governance and strategy; (ii) organizational and professional dimensions; (iii) economic and financial dimensions. For each theme, a number of factors and challenges faced at different health care levels were identified.ConclusionsThis study allowed shedding light on multi-level and interdependent factors affecting utilization of telemedicine in Norway. The identification of the main implementation and utilization challenges might support decision makers and practitioners in the successful scaling-up of telemedicine. This work provides a knowledge base useful to other countries which intend to implement telemedicine or other digital health services into their healthcare systems.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-017-0576-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinician Telemedicine Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…The observation that higher satisfaction with the quality of telemedicine care was associated with urban location is compatible with a study in Norway that showed small hospitals are less likely to use telemedicine because it decreases the need for physical presence of clinicians, and might lead to difficulties with recruitment and retention of clinicians to rural sites. 25 The American Medical Association Physician Benchmark Survey found that the financial burden of implementing telemedicine may be a barrier for small practices. 26…”

Introducing Videoconferencing on Tablet Computers in Nurse–Patient Communication: Technical and Training Challenges

“…The use of information and communication technology (ICT) has a long history [ 10 ]. Although ICT like VC are more commonly used in surgical treatment, there are few studies on the use of VC as a tool in primary cancer care [ 11 – 13 ].…”

Video consultations for covid-19

“…Organisational case studies have shown that introducing video consultations is a complex change that disrupts long established processes and routines 891011. Some clinicians express concerns about technical and clinical quality, privacy, safety, and accountability (for example, in relation to litigation if something goes wrong) 91011. Whether justified or not, these reservations can be a major barrier to expanded use.…”