2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring temporal variations of oxygen saturation constants of nitrifying bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies highlighted the differences due to the smaller size of the MBR flocs [13] such as the lower half-saturation constant for oxygen [14,15], while others pointed to the larger vulnerability to the phenomena of inhibition [16] observed in MBR activated sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies highlighted the differences due to the smaller size of the MBR flocs [13] such as the lower half-saturation constant for oxygen [14,15], while others pointed to the larger vulnerability to the phenomena of inhibition [16] observed in MBR activated sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CAS system, during a period of higher SVI and smaller floc size, at approximately 200 µm, these workers found a lower K DO,AOB value of 0.50 mg/l, or approximately 63% the value at the larger floc size. Daebel et al (2007) also compared MBR and CAS systems but found a less dramatic difference. Floc sizes in the MBR and CAS systems were approximately 30 µm for the MBR system and 100 µm for the CAS system.…”
Section: Domentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, low dissolved oxygen is used as a strategy to wash-out NOB to realize nitritation (Wang and Yang, 2004). However, some studies still reported a higher K O for AOB than NOB (Daebel et al, 2007;Manser et al, 2005;Regmi et al, 2014). In fact, very wide K O ranges of 0.03 to 1.5 mg dissolved oxygen/L and 0.13 to 3.00 mg dissolved oxygen/L were reported for AOB and NOB, respectively (Arnaldos et al, 2015;Ge et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rittmann and McCarty (1980), at 20 8C; bBlackburne et al (2008), 20 8C; cDaebel et al (2007), 20 8C; d Manser et al (2005), 20 8C; e Guisasola et al (2005), 25 8C; f Regmi et al (2014), 25 8C; g Pérez et al (2009), 20 8C; h Moussa et al (2005), 20 8C; i Liu et al (2016), 35 8C; j Schramm et al (1999), 30 8C; k Wett et al (2013), 20 8C; l Ge et al (2015), 20 8C; m Metcalf and Eddy, (2003), 20 8C; n Van Hulle et al (2007), 35 8C; 8 Galí et al (2007), 30-35 8C; p Hellinga et al (1998), 20 8C; q Liu and Wang (2013), 20 8C; r Hunik et al (1994), 20 8C; s Park and Noguera (2007), 30 8C; t Kaelin et al (2009), 20 8C; u Kampschreur et al (2007), 20 8C; v Wett and Rauch…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%