Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on OpenCL - IWOCL '15 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2791321.2791326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the features of OpenCL 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors believe that UMA can lead to performance improvements in benchmarks where a small subset of the data is repeatedly accessed. In addition, Mukherjee et al 36 compared the performance of OpenCL 2.0 and OpenCL 1.2 versions of four benchmarks (AES, FIR, IIR, and HMM) on an AMD R9 290X GPU. One of the features they used in the OpenCL 2.0 versions was SVM coarse‐grained buffers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors believe that UMA can lead to performance improvements in benchmarks where a small subset of the data is repeatedly accessed. In addition, Mukherjee et al 36 compared the performance of OpenCL 2.0 and OpenCL 1.2 versions of four benchmarks (AES, FIR, IIR, and HMM) on an AMD R9 290X GPU. One of the features they used in the OpenCL 2.0 versions was SVM coarse‐grained buffers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%