2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0632-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being by understanding the preferences for natural capital-based and produced capital-based ecosystem services

Abstract: Scenario analysis is recognized as a useful tool for exploring future changes in the relationships between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being. This analysis should be carried out not only by experts but also by relevant stakeholders such as the public. In this study, we investigated the preference of Japanese people toward natural and produced capital-based ES by distributing questionnaires to the public for exploring the direction of ES utilization in the future. Respondents with diverse backgrounds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acceptability issues in the bioeconomy extend beyond the social appreciation of bio-based products or bioeconomy-related ecosystem services by consumers (e.g. Toppinen et al 2013; Hori et al 2019 ) and also include—more broadly—the legitimacy of bioeconomy conceptualization, and goals and measures as understood by experts and the public. Examples of contested issues in this context include sustainable biomass sourcing, property rights and appropriation of bioresources, genetic information or traditional knowledge, along with the use and perceptions of genetically modified organisms (Chapotin and Wolt 2007 ; Pfau et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptability issues in the bioeconomy extend beyond the social appreciation of bio-based products or bioeconomy-related ecosystem services by consumers (e.g. Toppinen et al 2013; Hori et al 2019 ) and also include—more broadly—the legitimacy of bioeconomy conceptualization, and goals and measures as understood by experts and the public. Examples of contested issues in this context include sustainable biomass sourcing, property rights and appropriation of bioresources, genetic information or traditional knowledge, along with the use and perceptions of genetically modified organisms (Chapotin and Wolt 2007 ; Pfau et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural services are the non-material benefits obtained by people through spiritual enrichment, recreation, and cognitive development. Supporting services are necessary for the other three services and for the production of all other ecosystem services, for example, soil formation, nutrient cycling, and the habitats of organisms [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem services effectively strengthen the relationship between ecosystem functions and human well-being [ 1 ]. Costanza (1998) proposed that the valuation of recreational destinations is a vital accounting element in ecosystem services [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%