“…Shi [ 22 ], Zhao et al [ 23 ], Xie et al [ 24 ], Yao et al [ 25 ] and Wang et al [ 26 ] used comprehensive indicator evaluation model, random effect panel Tobit model, improved STIRPAT model, coupling coordination degree model and other research methods to empirically analyze the spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of the coupling coordination between new-type urbanization and ecological environment. Yang et al [ 27 ], Liu et al [ 28 ], Shi [ 29 ], Liu and Zhi [ 30 ], Han et al [ 31 ], Cui et al [ 32 ], Shang and Jiang [ 33 ], Feng et al [ 34 ], Zhu et al [ 35 ], Yang et al [ 36 ], Ma et al [ 37 ] take, respectively, Shaanxi Province, Fujian Province, China’s coastal zone, Beijing city, the Yangtze River economic belt, the Yellow River Basin, the Tibet Autonomous Region, the pan third pole region, the Wanjiang demonstration area, Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration and Nanjing city as case-study examples to calculate, analyze and evaluate the coupling coordination degree of urbanization and ecological environment through the construction of indicator system of urbanization and ecological environment evaluation. These studies revealed that due to regional differences, different selection of evaluation indicators, different local policies and economic development and other factors, the urbanization process, ecological environment and the coupling coordination between the two in each regions exhibit different characteristics.…”