2011
DOI: 10.1080/17470911003691402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the relationship between vagal tone and event-related potentials in response to an affective picture task

Abstract: The present study is the first to investigate the relationship between vagal tone level and event-related potentials (ERPs) in adults. Numerous studies have shown a relationship between vagal tone and the individual differences between a variety of psychophysiological, affective, and social outcomes. This suggests that vagal tone can be related to how people process relevant affective social information at the brain level. This study aimed to assess whether the ERP response varies between high and low vagal to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(117 reference statements)
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, (e) temporal dynamics of action related to sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways during body homeostasis should be altered by insular lesions. This last process (relationship between autonomic body function and emotional action) has been recently highlighted by Craig (2005Craig ( , 2010; and emerging evidence of the relationship between peripheral and central systems in emotional processing has been described (Dufey et al 2010;Lane et al 1997). Table 2b summarizes the revised studies showing different alterations of these a-b-c-d-e components (perception, interoception, awareness, emotion, and sympathetic/parasympathetic involvement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, (e) temporal dynamics of action related to sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways during body homeostasis should be altered by insular lesions. This last process (relationship between autonomic body function and emotional action) has been recently highlighted by Craig (2005Craig ( , 2010; and emerging evidence of the relationship between peripheral and central systems in emotional processing has been described (Dufey et al 2010;Lane et al 1997). Table 2b summarizes the revised studies showing different alterations of these a-b-c-d-e components (perception, interoception, awareness, emotion, and sympathetic/parasympathetic involvement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognition, and especially consciousness, can be considered an emergent property of the organism and its environment. This ecological perspective allows for the placing of cognition in its context (see Barutta et al 2010;Cornejo et al 2007Cornejo et al , 2009Dufey et al 2010;Hurtado et al 2009;Ibáñez et al 2006Ibáñez et al , 2009Ibáñez et al , 2010Riveros et al 2010;San Martín et al 2010); at least in principle, and the analysis of cognition centered on the connection between the organism and its environment, and is not exclusively based on the internal mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Current mainstream cannot be characterized as being predominantly mechanistic and computational, while the concomitance of multiple paradigms competing with each another is clearly much more appropriate. The following paradigms challenge Kohler's definition of the computer metaphor: situated cognition (i.e., Brighton et al 2003;Clark 1997), embodied cognition (i.e., Anderson 2003;Haugeland 1995), cognitive linguistic (i.e., Johnson 1987;Lakoff and Johnson 1980), enaction (i.e., Varela et al 1991, Thompson andVarela 2001), extended mind (i.e., Clark and Chalmers 1998;Clark 2001), contextual cognition (Cornejo et al 2007(Cornejo et al , 2009Dufey et al 2010; Barutta et al 2010;Hurtado et al 2009;Ibañez et al 2006Ibañez et al , 2009Riveros et al 2010;San Martín et al 2010); distributed cognition (i.e., Cole and Engeströn 1991;Hutchins 1995), theory of activity (i.e., Bakhurst 1995;Engelsted 1993), dynamical approaches (Ibañez 2007a(Ibañez , b, 2008Tschacher and Dauwalder 2003), and synergetics (Haken 1997(Haken , 2003Haken et al 1985), among others. As a result, based on Kohler's definition of the machine paradigm, its application in contemporary work is considerably restricted.…”
Section: The Computer Metaphormentioning
confidence: 98%