2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the research fronts and main paths of literature: a case study of shareholder activism research

Abstract: As a relatively young and vibrant discipline, shareholder activism has evolved to become a critical element of corporate governance research. While both finance and law scholars have revealed strong interest on shareholder activism, the heterogeneity in the research concentration of these two fields makes shareholder activism a fragmented discipline. We believe it would be interesting and insightful to conduct a citation-based analysis through the case study encompassing related articles on this topic publishe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shareholder activism has recently evolved to serve as an additional monitoring tool to the existing CG mechanism in which process activist shareholders can pursue changes in the target firms without taking control of the firms. The activist shareholders generally submit a proposal for ballots during the annual general meeting if they are dissatisfied with corporate managers on issues including operational performance, stock performance, risk management, governance and social and environmental issues (Boyson & Mooradian, 2011; Brav et al., 2008; Goranova & Ryan, 2014; V. C. Ma & Liu, 2016).…”
Section: Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shareholder activism has recently evolved to serve as an additional monitoring tool to the existing CG mechanism in which process activist shareholders can pursue changes in the target firms without taking control of the firms. The activist shareholders generally submit a proposal for ballots during the annual general meeting if they are dissatisfied with corporate managers on issues including operational performance, stock performance, risk management, governance and social and environmental issues (Boyson & Mooradian, 2011; Brav et al., 2008; Goranova & Ryan, 2014; V. C. Ma & Liu, 2016).…”
Section: Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such technique is main path analysis (MPA). Originally proposed in Hummon and Doreian (1989), MPA has prospered in the information science community since Verspagen (2007) and attracted abundant applications in various domains (Batagelj, Ferligoj, & Squazzoni, 2017;Carley, Hummon, & Harty, 1993;Colicchia & Strozzi, 2012;Hummon, Doreian, & Freeman, 1990;Hung, Liu, Lu, & Tseng, 2014;Liang, Wang, Xue, & Cui, 2016;Liu, Lu, Lu, & Lin, 2013;Lucio-Arias & Leydesdorff, 2008;Ma & Liu, 2016;Mina, Ramlogan, Tampubolon, & Metcalfe, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without effective diffusion, knowledge would be worthless (Yu, Wang, & Yu, 2010). Knowledge diffusion has been an active research area in several fields (Argote & Ingram, 2000; Luo, Du, Liu, Xuan, & Wang, 2015; Ma & Liu, 2016; Park & Magee, 2017). This article aims to ascertain the knowledge diffusion process of MPM by looking into MPM’s development trajectories, revealing MPM research interlinkage and its development from the past to the present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%