2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10240-011-0033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential rarefaction of real curves with many components

Abstract: Given a positive real Hermitian holomorphic line bundle L over a smooth real projective manifold X, the space of real holomorphic sections of the bundle L d inherits for every d ∈ N * a L 2 scalar product which induces a Gaussian measure. When X is a curve or a surface, we estimate the volume of the cone of real sections whose vanishing locus contains many real components. In particular, the volume of the cone of maximal real sections decreases exponentially as d grows to infinity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [30] and [17], the subject changed since observables which cannot be computed locally were estimated, beginning with the number of components the zero set of the random function. In [20], higher Betti numbers were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30] and [17], the subject changed since observables which cannot be computed locally were estimated, beginning with the number of components the zero set of the random function. In [20], higher Betti numbers were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, Corollary 1.10 of [Let18], proves that the probability that there are no components in a prescribed region decays polynomially fast. The second, Theorem 1 of [GW11], deals with the other extreme and proves that polynomials of degree d >> 1 whose number of nodal components is maximal up to a linear term in d are exponentially rare in d. We hope that the proof of Theorem 1.4 can be adapted in order to get the lower concentration part of (1.1) with n = √ d for Kostlan polynomials of degree d >> 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where G n,d denotes the normalization constant needed to satisfy (11). Next using Equation (9) for d(n, ) and simplifying,…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%