2009
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2009.12.080758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure induced by WCDMA mobiles phones in operating networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
51
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each of the considered exposure circumstances, average specific absorption rates (SAR) for the brain and the whole body were derived from the literature (Gati et al 2009;Hadjem et al 2010;Huang et al 2014;Lauer et al 2013;Persson et al 2012;SEAWIND 2013;Vrijheid et al 2009). To obtain a cumulative daily brain and whole body dose for each study participant, the SAR values were multiplied by the average exposure duration per day for each exposure situation and summed up to one single brain and whole body dose measure.…”
Section: Rf-emf Dose Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of the considered exposure circumstances, average specific absorption rates (SAR) for the brain and the whole body were derived from the literature (Gati et al 2009;Hadjem et al 2010;Huang et al 2014;Lauer et al 2013;Persson et al 2012;SEAWIND 2013;Vrijheid et al 2009). To obtain a cumulative daily brain and whole body dose for each study participant, the SAR values were multiplied by the average exposure duration per day for each exposure situation and summed up to one single brain and whole body dose measure.…”
Section: Rf-emf Dose Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of these exposure situations, specific absorption rates (SAR) for the brain and the whole body were obtained from the literature (Gati et al 2009;Hadjem et al 2010;Huang et al 2014;Lauer et al 2013;Persson et al 2012;SEAWIND 2013;Vrijheid et al 2009). To obtain a brain and whole body dose for each study participant the obtained SAR values were multiplied by the average exposure duration per day for each exposure situation and summed up to one single brain and whole body dose.…”
Section: Rf-emf Dose Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major factor determining RF-EMF exposure is the type of network used to make a mobile phone call. Calls on the UMTS network cause on average 100-500 times less exposure than calls on the GSM network (Gati et al 2009). This implies that cumulative RF-EMF exposure is not just a function of the duration of mobile phone use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, cell phone use has rapidly increased, with more users and heavier use, whereas the evolution of cell phone technology has lowered the rate of individual radiofrequency exposure per use. [19][20][21] Overall, there is a strong trend of increasing cell phone use with time, as reflected in the DNBC data set. Prenatal and postnatal cell phone exposures increased dramatically by year, reflecting an increase in use by mothers and children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%