Enterprise Interoperability II
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-858-6_65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Influence Diagram Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 The process of developing extended influence diagrams generation process. For practical techniques for the elicitation of extended influence diagrams, the reader is referred to Lagerstrom et al (2007).…”
Section: Extended Influence Diagrams For Enterprise Architecture Analmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The process of developing extended influence diagrams generation process. For practical techniques for the elicitation of extended influence diagrams, the reader is referred to Lagerstrom et al (2007).…”
Section: Extended Influence Diagrams For Enterprise Architecture Analmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterative process of finding variables affecting modifiability is supported by knowledge elicitation guidelines and control steps. These have been described in Lagerström et al (2009aLagerström et al ( , 2007, , Lagerström et al (2009d). The result of the iterative process is a set of goal break-down fragments.…”
Section: Methods For Creating the Qualitative Part Of The Metamodelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, m of the fusion algorithm, the combination in (17) creates an intermediate factor ψ i with domain dom(ψ i ). Then, variable X i is eliminated only from ψ i in (17). We define…”
Section: Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It transforms defense trees [3] (an extension of attack trees with defenses attached to leaf nodes) into extended influence diagrams [17] (an extension of Bayesian networks with conjunctive and disjunctive nodes as well as countermeasures). The relationships between the nodes are encoded in conditional probability tables assigned to each node.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%