Extending MaxSAT to Solve the Coalition Structure Generation Problem with Externalities Based on Agent Relations

Abstract

SUMMARYCoalition Structure Generation (CSG) means partitioning agents into exhaustive and disjoint coalitions so that the sum of values of all the coalitions is maximized. Solving this problem could be facilitated by employing some compact representation schemes, such as marginal contribution network (MC-net). In MC-net, the CSG problem is represented by a set of rules where each rule is associated with a real-valued weights, and the goal is to maximize the sum of weights of rules under some constraints. This naturally leads to a combinatorial optimization problem that could be solved with weighted partial MaxSAT (WPM). In general, WPM deals with only positive weights while the weights involved in a CSG problem could be either positive or negative. With this in mind, in this paper, we propose an extension of WPM to handle negative weights and take advantage of the extended WPM to solve the MC-net-based CSG problem. Specifically, we encode the relations between each pair of agents and reform the MC-net as a set of Boolean formulas. Thus, the CSG problem is encoded as an optimization problem for WPM solvers. Furthermore, we apply this agent relation-based WPM with minor revision to solve the extended CSG problem where the value of a coalition is affected by the formation of other coalitions, a coalition known as externality. Experiments demonstrate that, compared to the previous encoding, our proposed method speeds up the process of solving the CSG problem significantly, as it generates fewer number of Boolean variables and clauses that need to be examined by WPM solver.

Overlapping coalition formation in game theory: A state-of-the-art review

“…PFGs Embedded MC-nets Ichimura et al, 2011;Liao et al, 2012;Michalak et al, 2008;Liao et al, 2014b;Ueda et al, 2018Others Banerjee & Kraemer, 2010Epstein & Bazzan, 2013;Mauro et al, 2010;Rahwan et al, 2012;Rahwan et al, 2009a;Fatima et al, 2016;Fatima & Wooldridge, 2019 CFGs MC-nets Ieong & Shoham, 2005;Li, Sycara, & Scheller-Wolf, 2010;Shoham & Leyton-Brown, 2010;Ueda et al, 2018;Liao et al, 2019 Synergy coalition groups Conitzer & Sandholm, 2006;Ohta et al, 2009;Sakurai et al, 2011;Bistaffa et al, 2014 Agent-type representation Aziz & de Keijzer, 2011;Rahwan et al, 2011a;Tuy et al, 1996 Skill-based representation Bachrach et al, 2010;Bachrach & Rosenschein, 2008;Ohta et al, 2009;Shehory & Kraus, 1996;Liu et al, 2016DCOP Minato, 1993Tran-Thanh et al, 2013Induced subgraph Bachrach et al, 2013Deng & Papadimitriou, 1994Others Björklund et al, 2009Dang & Jennings, 2004;Farinelli et al, 2013;Keinänen, 2009;Michalak et al, 2010b;Rahwan & Jennings, 2007;…”