2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31374-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending MKM Formats at the Statement Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To catch and mimic this practice, Mmt provides two mechanisms for representing elaborationbased features. Declaration patterns [23,25] are used for statements whose elaboration can be defined declaratively by simple rules. We use it to define HOL type definitions and the various definition principles of Mizar.…”
Section: User-level Versus Kernel-level Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To catch and mimic this practice, Mmt provides two mechanisms for representing elaborationbased features. Declaration patterns [23,25] are used for statements whose elaboration can be defined declaratively by simple rules. We use it to define HOL type definitions and the various definition principles of Mizar.…”
Section: User-level Versus Kernel-level Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…sT E X itself is integrated, and shares an underlying OMDOC ontology, with the MMT system (Rabe & Kohlhase, 2013;Horozal et al, 2012;Rabe, 2017) -a foundation-independent metaframework and API for knowledge management services. This integration makes the generic services provided by MMT-e.g.…”
Section: Mmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To catch and mimic this practice, Mmt provides two mechanisms for representing elaboration-based features. Declaration patterns [23,25] are used for statements whose elaboration can be defined declaratively by simple rules. We use it to define HOL type definitions and the various definition principles of Mizar.…”
Section: User-level Vs Kernel-level Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%