2009
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.027581-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive genomic diversity of closely related Wolbachia strains

Abstract: Using microarray-based comparative genome hybridization (mCGH), the genomic content of Wolbachia pipientis wMel from Drosophila melanogaster was compared to the closely related Wolbachia from D. innubila (wInn), D. santomea (wSan), and three strains from D. simulans (wAu, wRi, wSim). A large number of auxiliary genes are identified in these five strains, with most absent/ divergent genes being unique to a given strain. Each strain caused an average of~60 genes to be removed from the core genome. As such, thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
98
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
15
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequent ISRpe1 lateral transfers pose, however, the question of the underlying transmission mechanisms: because IS lack the machinery for lateral transfer, endoymbionts should exchange more genetic material than ISRpe1. Precisely, this pattern has occasionally been reported from recent genomic studies (Ishmael et al, 2009;Penz et al, 2012;Duplouy et al, 2013). What is yet to be established is the extent of these DNA exchanges, especially across large phylogenetic distances, and whether this leads to important innovations in endosymbionts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequent ISRpe1 lateral transfers pose, however, the question of the underlying transmission mechanisms: because IS lack the machinery for lateral transfer, endoymbionts should exchange more genetic material than ISRpe1. Precisely, this pattern has occasionally been reported from recent genomic studies (Ishmael et al, 2009;Penz et al, 2012;Duplouy et al, 2013). What is yet to be established is the extent of these DNA exchanges, especially across large phylogenetic distances, and whether this leads to important innovations in endosymbionts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In some cases, ISRpe1 transfers might be thus facilitated by the presence of WO bacteriophages that commonly jump between Wolbachia strains (Bordenstein and Wernegreen, 2004;Chafee et al, 2010;Atyame et al, 2011). Occasionally, WO bacteriophages may also undergo distant lateral transfer, as recently reported in Rickettsia (Ishmael et al, 2009), and then introduce ISRpe1 to recipient endosymbionts phylogenetically distant from donor strain. In addition, the presence of plasmids in many Cardinium and Rickettsia strains (Ogata et al, 2005;Penz et al, 2012) might serve as shuttles for transferring ISRpe1 among strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it is intriguing that these pathogens often possess T4SS gene clusters bearing duplications of certain virB-like genes. Homologs of most of the VirB/ VirD4 genes were identified in all species of the Anaplasmataceae (Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ruminantium, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma marginale, Wolbachia spp., Neorickettsia sennetsu) as well as the Rickettsiaceae (Rickettsia typhi, Rickettsia prowazekii, and Rickettsia conorii) (7,61,106,108,136,140,188,205,206).…”
Section: More Gram-negative Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteriophages and other mobile genetic elements also play important evolutionary roles in bacterial endosymbiont systems of insect hosts [279][280][281][282]. The extensive genome diversity found among parasitic arthropod bacterial symbionts (Wolbachia, Rickettsia) was shown to reside primarily in regions originating from HGT between Wolbachia strains that coinfect a diverse set of insect host cells [280,282,283].…”
Section: Toxin Evolution In the Guts Of Insects And Other Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 98%