2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01271-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation and modification of the Oslo grading system for prediction of postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the unilateral grading system cannot be applied to patients with bilateral CSDH. In the future, we need develop a model to predict the recurrence of bilateral CSDH ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the unilateral grading system cannot be applied to patients with bilateral CSDH. In the future, we need develop a model to predict the recurrence of bilateral CSDH ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study presents the largest sample size used to develop any CSDH recurrence prediction system (see Table 5 for a summary of other systems). [ 2 , 16 , 33 , 39 , 43 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five CSDH recurrence or risk grading systems have been proposed. [ 2 , 16 , 33 , 39 , 43 ] The components of each grading system are described in Table 5 . The sample size for each scale is smaller than the cohort used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nonrandomized setting left the therapy of choice in the decision of the attending physician. The SDH volume determination method (ABC/2)5 might cause a systematic error in results (up to 5% error according to Konczalla et al [ 38 ]. Although all patients received standardized treatment, retrospective design and the absence of study protocol might further corrupt the dataset.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%