2021
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation of CAGE‐B and SAGE‐B scores for Asian chronic hepatitis B patients with well‐controlled viremia by antivirals

Abstract: CAGE‐B and SAGE‐B scores, consisting of age and fibrotic burden as cirrhosis and/or liver stiffness, were recently proposed to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk among Caucasian chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients undergoing long‐term antiviral therapy. We externally validated their predictive performances among an independent cohort from Asia, compared to other conventional prediction models. We consecutively recruited CHB patients with well‐controlled viremia (serum HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL) receiving an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of this study is that we analyzed a large number of homogeneous patients who were treated uniformly with ETV or TFV for at least for 5 years at two university hospitals. A recent study conducted in South Korea attempted to validate the CAGE-B and SAGE-B scores in Asian patients; however, those treated with other NAs, besides ETV or TFV, or those treated for less than 5 years were included in that study [ 26 ]. In our validation study, which included patients who were essentially the same as the original CAGE-B/SAGE-B cohort, the CAGE-B score yielded an acceptable predictive accuracy with AUCs varying between 0.75 and 0.85 in the entire and subgroup analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of this study is that we analyzed a large number of homogeneous patients who were treated uniformly with ETV or TFV for at least for 5 years at two university hospitals. A recent study conducted in South Korea attempted to validate the CAGE-B and SAGE-B scores in Asian patients; however, those treated with other NAs, besides ETV or TFV, or those treated for less than 5 years were included in that study [ 26 ]. In our validation study, which included patients who were essentially the same as the original CAGE-B/SAGE-B cohort, the CAGE-B score yielded an acceptable predictive accuracy with AUCs varying between 0.75 and 0.85 in the entire and subgroup analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although THRI (Toronto HCC risk index) has shown good predictive ability for HCC in patients with cirrhosis [ 93 ], it was not superior to mPAGE-B in Korean CHB patients [ 91 ]. Meanwhile, the CAGE-B (cirrhosis and age) and SAGE-B (stiffness and age) models, which were developed from Western studies [ 94 ], has been validated by several Korean retrospective studies [ 95 , 96 ]. A recently developed FSAC (fibrosis marker response, sex, age, cirrhosis) model that incorporates on-therapy changes in non-invasive fibrosis markers (fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] or aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index [APRI]) has been validated in a separate cohort of Korean CHB patients [ 97 ].…”
Section: Natural Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these problems, novel scoring systems were developed in patients on treatment. The PAGE-B (age, sex and platelet count), CAGE-B (age, presence of baseline cirrhosis), SAGE-B (age, liver stiffness measurements), CAMD (cirrhosis, age, male sex, diabetes mellitus) and HCC-RESCUE (age, sex, cirrhosis) scoring systems all have high negative predictive values for HCC development in their low-risk groups[ 7 , 14 - 16 ]. Among current scoring systems, the PAGE-B is the only one that does not include cirrhosis as a parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%