2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1607-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study

Abstract: Disparity in case mix, a higher prevalence of outcome events and important unmeasured patient mix factors are possible sources for the decay of the models' predictive accuracy in our population. The lack of generalisability of standard prognostic models requires their validation and re-calibration before they can be applied with confidence to new populations. Customisation of existing models may become an important strategy to obtain authentic information on disease severity, which is a prerequisite for reliab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
74
3
12

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
18
74
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some evidence to suggest that the APACHE III is a superior prognostic model. 15 However, further larger studies are required to confirm the absolute specificity of this association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is some evidence to suggest that the APACHE III is a superior prognostic model. 15 However, further larger studies are required to confirm the absolute specificity of this association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their potential and use in clinical management of patients can have significant health, social and economic impact (Beck et al 2003;Lin et al 2007;Lilja et al 2008;Juneja et al 2011). Hence, the search for better, more accurate, and better discriminating models that require only the most certain and measurable of input data is an ongoing task (Beck et al 2003;Rowan et al 2007;Minne et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, such scores (e.g., SAPS 3 and APACHE III) have been reported to face the same drawbacks as SAPS II [9,12,38]. Moreover, those scores remain the most widely used scores in practice [39].…”
Section: What Are the Next Steps?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since first being published, they have been modified several times in order to improve their predictive performance [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Despite these extensions of SAPS, predicted hospital mortality remains generally overestimated [8,9,[12][13][14]. As an illustration, Poole et al [9] compared the SAPS II and the SAPS3 performance in a cohort of more than 28,000 admissions to 10 different Italian ICUs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%