2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2005.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extra-Ascending Aortic Versus Intra-Descending Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation—Effect on Coronary Artery Blood Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also increases peak diastolic flow velocity by 117% and coronary flow velocity integral by 87% as shown by previous ECG and color Doppler studies [6•]. EAB counterpulsation devices have been shown to be similar to known hemodynamic effects of IABP devices [11]. In vivo studies of Davies et al [11] compared the hemodynamic effect of the existing IABP technique with the newly developed EAB device in an acute pig model.…”
Section: Initial Temporary Pre-clinical Hemodynamic Studies On C-pulsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It also increases peak diastolic flow velocity by 117% and coronary flow velocity integral by 87% as shown by previous ECG and color Doppler studies [6•]. EAB counterpulsation devices have been shown to be similar to known hemodynamic effects of IABP devices [11]. In vivo studies of Davies et al [11] compared the hemodynamic effect of the existing IABP technique with the newly developed EAB device in an acute pig model.…”
Section: Initial Temporary Pre-clinical Hemodynamic Studies On C-pulsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…3A, point 3). More importantly, coronary blood flow studies by Davies et al [11] reported that EAB was more efficient in improving diastolic coronary blood flow over baseline by 69% (P< 0.05) compared with IABP during counterpulsation with 1:1 augmentation mode. The diastolic blood coronary flow in the 1:2 mode was also increased significantly by EAB (63%, assisted vs unassisted beat, P<0.05) compared with IABP (28%, P<0.01; Fig.…”
Section: Initial Temporary Pre-clinical Hemodynamic Studies On C-pulsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations