2020
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-00029-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraordinary human energy consumption and resultant geological impacts beginning around 1950 CE initiated the proposed Anthropocene Epoch

Abstract: Growth in fundamental drivers—energy use, economic productivity and population—can provide quantitative indications of the proposed boundary between the Holocene Epoch and the Anthropocene. Human energy expenditure in the Anthropocene, ~22 zetajoules (ZJ), exceeds that across the prior 11,700 years of the Holocene (~14.6 ZJ), largely through combustion of fossil fuels. The global warming effect during the Anthropocene is more than an order of magnitude greater still. Global human population, their productivity… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
146
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
4
146
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, it is a widely recognizable marker that closely coincides (e.g., fig. 1 of Bancone et al, 2020) with the sharp and pronounced difference in trajectory of many key Earth System parameters that provided the initial impetus for the chronostratigraphic (geological) Anthropocene (quantified by Syvitski et al, 2020), and that remains the justification accepted by the AWG. This is seen prominently in the steep rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations (Figure 2), which clearly depart from the Holocene trend of overall stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Rather, it is a widely recognizable marker that closely coincides (e.g., fig. 1 of Bancone et al, 2020) with the sharp and pronounced difference in trajectory of many key Earth System parameters that provided the initial impetus for the chronostratigraphic (geological) Anthropocene (quantified by Syvitski et al, 2020), and that remains the justification accepted by the AWG. This is seen prominently in the steep rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations (Figure 2), which clearly depart from the Holocene trend of overall stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, it allows consistent comparison of rates of change of different Earth processes with those of other time intervals, not least quantitatively (e.g. Syvitski et al, 2020) For instance, in the ~70 years of the chronostratigraphic Anthropocene up to 2015, the amount of Earth surface rock and sediment moved and reshaped by human mineral/rock extraction and construction activities was some 6.4 trillion tonnes, 30-fold larger than during the previous 70 years (Cooper et al, 2018). This is some seven times greater than the mass of sediment carried by the Earth's rivers to the ocean, and about two orders of magnitude greater than the total mass of magma erupted by the world's volcanoes (http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/eruption-rates) over that time.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it remains an unofficial geological unit. Neither the ICS nor the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) have officially approved the Anthropocene as a recognized subdivision of geologic time and how it should be demarcated remains a matter of discussion [81][82][83][84] . On this basis, Defaunation resin was produced within the Anthropocene in a different time relative to the remainder of the Holocene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%