2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremity in horizontal and vertical Likert scale format responses. Some evidence on how visual distance between response categories influences extreme responding

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The in-depth interviews were designed to demonstrate three attitudes of respondent farmers, namely (i) the wish to be back on planting in the liquefaction-affected land; (ii) the willingness to consume agricultural products on the liquefaction-affected land; and (iii) the responses to the government’s plan to relocate elsewhere. The farmers’ responses to these three attitudes and decisions are identified on Likert Scale [ 15 ] with a range of perceptions, "Strongly disagree-1–2–3–4–5 –Strongly agree". By paying attention to the statement items, the respondent farmers affected by liquefaction disaster had to choose numbers 1 to 5 based on the following criteria:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-depth interviews were designed to demonstrate three attitudes of respondent farmers, namely (i) the wish to be back on planting in the liquefaction-affected land; (ii) the willingness to consume agricultural products on the liquefaction-affected land; and (iii) the responses to the government’s plan to relocate elsewhere. The farmers’ responses to these three attitudes and decisions are identified on Likert Scale [ 15 ] with a range of perceptions, "Strongly disagree-1–2–3–4–5 –Strongly agree". By paying attention to the statement items, the respondent farmers affected by liquefaction disaster had to choose numbers 1 to 5 based on the following criteria:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grading in this study uses a Likert scale to get quantitative data. Likert type vertical scale format is a visual distance that is usually covered by the rating scale: the endpoint in the horizontal Likert scale format is visually further apart from the midpoint compared to the vertical Likert scale format, where only the dashed lines represent different response categories (Weijters et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, thorough user needs are identified by using three ergonomic need dimensions integrated with UCD. Next, the relative importance of user needs is rated with a 5-point Likert scale [74]. Cronbach's coefficient alpha statistic [75] is used to test the internal consistency and reliability of user needs.…”
Section: E Ergonomic Product Design Model Of Zhang Andmentioning
confidence: 99%