2018
DOI: 10.3390/math6060105
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-Convex Contraction via Admissible Mapping and Related Fixed Point Theorems with an Application

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, we introduce F-convex contraction via admissible mapping in the sense of Wardowski [Fixed points of a new type of contractive mappings in complete metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 94 (2012), 6 pages] which extends convex contraction mapping of type-2 of Istrǎţescu [Some fixed point theorems for convex contraction mappings and convex non-expansive mappings (I), Libertas Mathematica, 1(1981), 151-163] and establish a fixed point theorem in the setting of metric space. Our result e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition 2 (see [11]). An α-admissible mapping T is said to be α * -admissible, if for each x, y ∈ FixðTÞ ≠ ∅, we have αðx, yÞ ≥ 1: If FixðTÞ = ∅, we say that T is vacuously α * -admissible.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Definition 2 (see [11]). An α-admissible mapping T is said to be α * -admissible, if for each x, y ∈ FixðTÞ ≠ ∅, we have αðx, yÞ ≥ 1: If FixðTÞ = ∅, we say that T is vacuously α * -admissible.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Istratescu [2] introduced a class of convex contraction mappings in metric spaces and generalized the well-known Banach contraction principle. Afterwards, some works have appeared on the generalization of such classes of mappings in the setting of various spaces [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. We focus on the research works of Eke et al [5] for our purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proof of the Theorem 2 [1], instead of the following: "By Lemma 1, {d p (x n , x n+1 )} is strictly non-increasing sequence. Therefore,…”
Section: It Should Readmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found some errors in Lemma 1 of our paper [1], thus, we would like to make the following corrections:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Website: http://www.math.uvic.ca/faculty/harimsri/ This volume contains the successfully invited and accepted submissions (see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]) to a Special Issue of MDPI's journal, Mathematics in the subject area of "Operators of Fractional Calculus and Their Applications".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%