2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-29063-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face masks: a COVID-19 protector or environmental contaminant?

Sukhendu Dey,
Palas Samanta,
Deblina Dutta
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been estimated that they produced between 150 000 and 390 000 tons of waste per year and 173 000 microfibres per day. 7 Technological advances in mask manufacture to improve their effectiveness may produce further environmental problems. 8 If it is thought that mask wearing is an easy and painless way to reduce transmission, it is probably a myth.…”
Section: Infection and Transmission Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been estimated that they produced between 150 000 and 390 000 tons of waste per year and 173 000 microfibres per day. 7 Technological advances in mask manufacture to improve their effectiveness may produce further environmental problems. 8 If it is thought that mask wearing is an easy and painless way to reduce transmission, it is probably a myth.…”
Section: Infection and Transmission Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, traditional polymer materials used for filtration media are typically derived from non-renewable oil sources. Once used, these materials can only be incinerated or disposed of in landfills, creating an environmental burden [22]. As a result, there is a growing concern for the development and production of environmentally friendly nonwoven filtration materials [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%