2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0

Abstract: FNGS 2.0 incorporates regional scoring of facial movement, providing additional information while maintaining agreement comparable to the original scale. Ambiguities regarding use of the grading scale are addressed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MR imaging was performed to exclude a neoplastic cause of facial palsy. Initial House-Brackmann grade 22 was II in 6 patients, III in 12, IV in 16, and V in 2.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…MR imaging was performed to exclude a neoplastic cause of facial palsy. Initial House-Brackmann grade 22 was II in 6 patients, III in 12, IV in 16, and V in 2.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Good facial function was defined as House-Brackmann Grade I or II. 24 The median follow-up for all patients included in this analysis was 46 months (range 2-259 months).…”
Section: Clinical and Neuroimaging Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report we analyzed the facial nerve function in patients initially treated with microsurgery. We analyzed the outcomes of patients treated with the facial nervesparing technique, recording the following: facial nerve function before and after treatment (using the modified HB scale 20 ); any morbidity associated with the procedure, such as CSF leaks and hydrocephalus; and whether further treatment was needed to control tumor growth. Our findings in this patient set ascertained the efficacy of a dedicated, facial nerve-sparing microsurgical approach in treating patients with VS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%