2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facies depositional setting, mineral maturity and sequence stratigraphy of a Holocene drowned valley, Tamaki Estuary, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The older date suggests that the estuary rapidly infilled in order to have reached −1 m below sea level by ∼6800 years cal BP. This date is equivalent to the timing of infill found in other New Zealand estuaries (Sheffield et al ., 1995; Heap and Nichol, 1997; Swales et al ., 2005; Abrahim et al ., 2008; Kennedy et al ., 2008). The younger date indicates that reworking of the upper sediments was occurring at least 2000 years before present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The older date suggests that the estuary rapidly infilled in order to have reached −1 m below sea level by ∼6800 years cal BP. This date is equivalent to the timing of infill found in other New Zealand estuaries (Sheffield et al ., 1995; Heap and Nichol, 1997; Swales et al ., 2005; Abrahim et al ., 2008; Kennedy et al ., 2008). The younger date indicates that reworking of the upper sediments was occurring at least 2000 years before present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sand beds of the lower section with tabular cross-bedding suggest a tidal-channel deposit. The near absence of bioturbation and few burrows in this unit may reflect high energy conditions and high sediment accumulation rates (e.g., Abrahim et al, 2008) in the depositional environment, consistent with the relatively low abundances and simple diversities of benthic foraminifera and ostracods. On the basis of the downcore distribution of grain sizes, DU 6 can also be subdivided into two sections.…”
Section: Depositional Units Sedimentary Facies and Chronology Of Comentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, certain interpretations have been agreed upon. First, channel, overbank, estuarine, and deltaic facies associations are the main facies associations represented in the infill deposits (Sakai et al 2006;Wilson et al 2007;Abrahim et al 2008). Secondly, finingupward trends dominate in infill sedimentary sequences, such as in transitions from lower fluvial facies to upper deltaic facies.…”
Section: Sedimentary Characteristics Of the Lmvsmentioning
confidence: 99%