Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2854946.2855002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Analysis of a Search Self-Efficacy Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants' search self-efficacy was measured with the Search Self-Efficacy scale [9], which contains 14 items describing different search activities. Participants indicated their confidence in completing each activity using a 10-point scale, where 1=totally unconfident and 10=totally confident.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' search self-efficacy was measured with the Search Self-Efficacy scale [9], which contains 14 items describing different search activities. Participants indicated their confidence in completing each activity using a 10-point scale, where 1=totally unconfident and 10=totally confident.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental models can change as new information is interpreted and new understandings are constructed or altered to fit [66]. Any misalignment between interpretation and reality can negatively affect people's mental models and their self-efficacy [67][68][69].…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinnings: Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These surveys help to understand the students' contexts, and situate them as learners performing long‐term information searching. The components of the survey are adapted from established instruments, such as Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (Ryan, 1982), Self‐Regulation Questionnaire (Brown et al, 1999), Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Schraw & Dennison, 1994; Terlecki & McMahon, 2018), Search Self‐Efficacy Scale (Brennan et al, 2016), Note Taking Strategies Inventory (UMass Amherst Student Success, 2021), and others. The two synchronous sessions, SES and SES3, are online observations with screen, audio, and search‐log recording.…”
Section: Lonitudinal Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%