2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factores predictores de complicaciones infecciosas en el postoperatorio de la nefrolitotomía percutánea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study recorded a significantly higher rate of post-operative sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in women (OR 7.8, p = 0.001) [33]. Overall, all the studies determined female gender to be a risk factor for developing sepsis post-stone surgery [32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Post-intervention Sepsismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study recorded a significantly higher rate of post-operative sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in women (OR 7.8, p = 0.001) [33]. Overall, all the studies determined female gender to be a risk factor for developing sepsis post-stone surgery [32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Post-intervention Sepsismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sepsis is the leading cause of KSD-related mortality [31]. Seven studies were identified, which investigated sepsis post-KSD intervention [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. It has previously been demonstrated that women have higher sepsis rates after ureteroscopy (URS) than men [39].…”
Section: Post-intervention Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is still controversy about the association between diabetes and post-PCNL infection. Some studies believed that there was a connection between them, but some researchers noted that the connection was not obvious 26,27 . Interestingly, from the data, we synthesized their views and found that diabetes did not directly affect the incidence of post-PCNL infection (Supplement Tables S2, S4 and S6), but the results were significant when the risk scores were compared in groups (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%