2022
DOI: 10.1177/00302228221116515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial Validity, Reliability, Measurement Invariance and the Graded Response Model for the COVID-19 Anxiety Scale in a Sample of Ecuadorians

Abstract: The aims of the research are to evaluate the factorial validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, discrimination, and difficulty of the Covid-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS) applied to a sample of Ecuadorian adults ( N = 451). The study is based on an instrumental design with Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) technics. The results confirmed the validity of the CAS single-factor structure, with measurement invariance across gender and high internal consistency. Additionally, all CAS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Los modelos de ajuste se probaron de acuerdo a los indicadores absolutos, como el chi cuadrado (χ 2 ), el chi cuadrado normado (χ 2 /gl) y el Residuo Cuadrado Medio Estandarizado (SRMR); los indicadores relativos, Índice de Ajuste Comparativo (CFI) y el Índice de Tucker-Lewis (TLI); y el indicador no basado en la centralidad, Error Cuadrático Medio de Aproximación (RMSEA). Se consideran ajustes adecuados cuando el χ 2 no es significativo (p > .05) o el χ 2 /gl es menor a 4; el CFI y el TLI son superiores a .95; el SRMR y el RMSEA inferiores a .08 y las saturaciones (λ) superiores a .50 (Brown, 2015;Byrne, 2006;Domínguez-Lara, 2018;Moreta-Herrera et al, 2022;Mueller & Hancock, 2018;Wolf et al, 2013).…”
Section: Análisis De Los Resultadosunclassified
“…Los modelos de ajuste se probaron de acuerdo a los indicadores absolutos, como el chi cuadrado (χ 2 ), el chi cuadrado normado (χ 2 /gl) y el Residuo Cuadrado Medio Estandarizado (SRMR); los indicadores relativos, Índice de Ajuste Comparativo (CFI) y el Índice de Tucker-Lewis (TLI); y el indicador no basado en la centralidad, Error Cuadrático Medio de Aproximación (RMSEA). Se consideran ajustes adecuados cuando el χ 2 no es significativo (p > .05) o el χ 2 /gl es menor a 4; el CFI y el TLI son superiores a .95; el SRMR y el RMSEA inferiores a .08 y las saturaciones (λ) superiores a .50 (Brown, 2015;Byrne, 2006;Domínguez-Lara, 2018;Moreta-Herrera et al, 2022;Mueller & Hancock, 2018;Wolf et al, 2013).…”
Section: Análisis De Los Resultadosunclassified
“…The analysis of discrimination and difficulty of items was performed using a Graded Response Model (GRM). This is an extension of the 2-Parameter Logistic Model (2-PLM) for ordered polytomous items [48][49][50]. In the discrimination parameter, the slope of change of the answers to the items is analysed based on the level of ability that the person has.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exception is the work of Caycho-Rodríguez et al (2022b), which concludes that the PIL-SF items have adequate discrimination and difficulty, especially the item "Presence of goals/purpose in life" (item 20), which is the best discriminator and shows greater precision in the latent variable. The use of IRT allows a better understanding of the mechanism by which a measure manages to assess a specific construct (Hambleton et al, 2010;Moreta-Herrera et al, 2022). Thus, the use of CTT and IRT provides more precise information about the evaluative capacity of a measure.…”
Section: Pil-sf and The Item Response Theory (Irt)mentioning
confidence: 99%