Factors affecting blockchain adoption in apparel supply chains: does sustainability-oriented supplier development play a moderating role?

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting the intention to adopt blockchain technology (BT) in operations and supply chain and to explore the moderating role of sustainability-oriented supplier development on the effects studied.Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed a conceptual framework based on the integration of technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework and diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory along with several strands of the literature in supply chain management and information systems. Drawing on survey data from 412 supply firms, a novel model using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was empirically tested in the context of the apparel industry of Bangladesh – the world's second-largest apparel supplier nation.FindingsThe findings supported the theoretical framework developed. In particular, the findings suggested that supplier firms' intention to adopt blockchain in supply chains is influenced by relative advantage, compatibility, perceived trust, top management considerations, absorptive capacity, information sharing and collaborative culture, and trading partners' influence. However, regulatory support is yet to play a significant role in blockchain adoption behaviour. The findings also suggest that supplier development for sustainability significantly moderates the relationship between the several drivers' (e.g. relative advantage, compatibility, top management considerations and trading partners' influence) effects on blockchain adoption.Practical implicationsThe findings could help in developing an enabling environment for introducing blockchain-based apparel operations and supply chains.Originality/valueThe study contributes to and expands the embryonic research stream of sustainable supply chain management and BT. In particular, the paper provides neoteric evidence on how supplier development towards achieving sustainability moderates the effects of organizational, technological, and environmental drivers on the intention to adopt BT.

An SEM-ANN analysis of the impacts of Blockchain on competitive advantage

“…Therefore, there is a need to study factors that influence Blockchain integration in enabling SMEs to obtain a competitive advantage. Another reason is that although there exists some studies on Blockchain technology, these studies mainly focused on Blockchain adoption (Balasubramanian et al, 2021;Hashimy et al, 2022;Bhardwaj et al, 2021;Lanzini et al, 2021;Nath et al, 2022). Nevertheless, whether the adoption of Blockchain could lead to competitive advantage in organizations remains a mystery and thus leads to the need to conduct this study.…”

The role of technology in supply chain decarbonisation: towards an integrated conceptual framework

“…The combination of the DOI and TOE frameworks has been studied to investigate the adoption process, including the factors that lead to innovation adoption and the consequences (Dos Santos et al , 2014; Shree et al , 2021), and to discuss technology diffusion in SCM (Chan and Chong, 2013; Chong et al , 2009; Nath et al , 2022). The TOE framework and DOI theory both discuss internal and external technologies and organisational factors.…”

Impact of blockchain on the green innovation performance of enterprises under the policy uncertainty

“…Most of the literature on the implementation of blockchain technology focuses on its utilization in supply chains. This includes enhancing data traceability to improve transparency and accountability among supply chain stakeholders (Wong et al, 2020), advancing supply chain sustainability (Saberi et al, 2018;Nath et al, 2022) and mitigating supply chain risks (Rauniyar et al, 2022). Blockchain can also help enterprises improve operational efficiency by connecting supply chain-related organizations to integrate goods, logistics and information flows, thereby reducing operational costs (Iansiti and Lakhani, 2017).…”

“…, 2020), advancing supply chain sustainability (Saberi et al. , 2018; Nath et al. , 2022) and mitigating supply chain risks (Rauniyar et al.…”