Factors Affecting R&D Share in University Revenues: Case of Russia

Abstract

Recent government projects and initiatives (such as Priority 2030) have significantly increased the role of universities in creating and commercializing innovations in Russia. One of the most important indicators of university performance in these programs is R&D revenue. Its values have a significant deviation between universities that lead to different importance of R&D activities and make some universities more R&D oriented than others in the terms of their economics. This orientation can be considered an important factor of university sustainability as it allows it to be less dependent on admission volume which varies due to demographic waves and other endogenous factors. This paper studies the factors affecting the R&D orientation of big Russian universities. Monitoring the Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions provides sufficient data on Russian universities for such study including the share of R&D revenue in the total value of revenue which is used as a measure of R&D orientation. This study analyses the factors affecting this indicator using the data from the 49 largest Russian universities between 2015 and 2020 to build econometric panel data models. The modelling proves the significance of various factors such as entrance scores of students, the number of publications per faculty member, the share of young researchers, the ratio of average salary to the regional average salary, and the share of faculty members holding doctoral degrees. The research highlights the connection between publication performance and R&D activities and the importance of supporting young researchers in the development of scientific entrepreneurship.

Formation of Research Projects Considering Their Commercial Value and the Probability of Demand

“…При формировании набора прикладных НИР для реализации в предстоящем кален-дарном году традиционно ориентируются на систему критериев, по которым оцениваются проекты [9,10]. Итоговые оценки позволяют найти балльную оценку проекта НИР и, исходя из возможностей финансирования, включить рассматриваемый проект в план научных исследований будущего года [11]. В данной процедуре имеются существенные недостатки:…”