“…A total of fourteen studies were included in the review [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. The studies were conducted in a range of different geographies in mostly high income countries and to a lesser extent low-middle income countries: Australia n = 3 [ 47 , 54 , 59 ]; Canada n = 3 [ 48 , 50 , 51 ]; France n = 1 [ 46 ]; India n = 2 [ 55 , 57 ]; United Kingdom n = 1 [ 58 ]; United States of America n = 3 [ 49 , 53 , 56 ]; Mixed geographies n = 1 [ 52 ]. In studies with both rural and non-rural participants the rural/remote/regional n ranged from seventeen to seventy-three per cent of the total sample [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].…”