Purpose
To analyze factors influencing tacrolimus (TAC) trough concentration (C
0
) in β-thalassemia major (β-TM) pediatric patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) and to investigate the effects of genotype polymorphism and drug-drug interactions on TAC trough concentration in children with β-TM. Furthermore, to analyze the correlation between TAC C
0
and efficacy and adverse reactions.
Patients and Methods
Prospectively collection of demographic information and details of combined treatment of patients with β-TM receiving HSCT, and genotypes of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2032582) were obtained for each patient. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to investigate influencing factors on TAC C
0
. The impact of different genotypes and the co-administration of azole antifungal drugs on β-TM patients receiving TAC were evaluated, together with the correlation between acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), infection, and liver injury of TAC C
0
.
Results
A total of 46 patients with 587 concentration data were included. The multiple linear regression results showed that the patient’s sex, weight, postoperative time, hemoglobin, platelet count, serum cystatin C, and combined voriconazole were independent influencing factors of the infusion trough concentration/daily dose, C
0
/D
iv
. Age, body surface area, postoperative time, co-administration of voriconazole, and CYP3A4*18B are independent influencing factors of C
0
/D
po
. Group comparisons showed that voriconazole can affect TAC C
0
administered intravenously (IV) and orally in β-TM pediatric patients, while patient genotype can affect TAC C
0
during oral administration. TAC C
0
does not correlate with aGVHD or liver injury, but infection may be associated with TAC C
0
.
Conclusion
The concentration of TAC should be closely monitored when co-administered with voriconazole. It is worth considering that the influence of genotype on the trough concentration of oral TAC and individualized drug administration warrant investigation. Finally, this study indicated that C
0
is not suitable as an indicator of the efficacy of TAC.