2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with the eruption of the impacted maxillary third molars after second molar extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be closely related to the smaller size of the second molar compared to the first molar which reduces cortical bone anchorage and facilitates second molar protraction. One interesting phenomenon is the spontaneous partial uprighting rather than further mesial tilting of the third molar; this is similar to the spontaneous eruption of the third molar after second molar extraction [15]. Such uprighting may be closely related to the existence of interseptal periodontal fibers between second and third molars that exert evenly distributed gentle forces along the root of the third molars [16,17].…”
Section: Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This may be closely related to the smaller size of the second molar compared to the first molar which reduces cortical bone anchorage and facilitates second molar protraction. One interesting phenomenon is the spontaneous partial uprighting rather than further mesial tilting of the third molar; this is similar to the spontaneous eruption of the third molar after second molar extraction [15]. Such uprighting may be closely related to the existence of interseptal periodontal fibers between second and third molars that exert evenly distributed gentle forces along the root of the third molars [16,17].…”
Section: Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For clinical use, one point was assigned for each factor associated with the change in PCS (i.e., 0–3 points). Afterward, they were categorized into three groups to obtain reliable estimates: 0 point, 1 point, or 2 points [ 40 ]. The observed probability was calculated for the three groups and then compared to the predicted probability based on the multivariable logistic regression model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%