Affordances represent features of an object that trigger specific actions. Here we tested whether the presence and orientation of a handle on a cup could bias grasping movements towards it in conditions where subjects were explicitly told to ignore the handle. We quantified the grip aperture profile of twelve healthy participants instructed to grasp a cup from its body while it either had no handle, a handle pointing towards, or away from the grasping hand (3 'move' conditions, with large grip aperture). To ensure the smaller grip aperture afforded by the handle was implicitly processed, we interspersed trials in which participants had to grasp the cup from its handle or a handle not attached to a cup with a small grip aperture. We found that grip aperture was smaller in the presence of a handle in the 'move' conditions, independently of its orientation. Our finding, of an effect of the handle during the execution of a grasp action, extends previous evidence of such an influence measured during motor preparation using simple reaction times. It suggests that the specific action elicited by an object's attribute can affect movement performance in a sustained manner throughout movement execution.The concept of 'affordance' was introduced by Gibson 1 to describe how features of objects (such as their physical properties) may be linked to a functional goal and the physical properties of an actor. Several behavioural studies have demonstrated that affordances modulate human movement performance, independent of the intention to act 2-10 . For example, Tucker and Ellis 2 instructed participants to make finger presses with their right or left hand in response to the orientation (up or down) of a handled object on a screen. They observed faster response times if the orientation of the handle on an object was compatible with the responding hand, reflecting the 'automatic' activation of an action to grasp the handle. Further studies have demonstrated that object features may 'automatically' trigger components of specific actions, such as reaching and grasping [3][4][5] .Nevertheless, the exact nature of affordance 'effects' remains elusive. Some authors have argued they represent spatial compatibility effects reported in other contexts [6][7][8][9] .A study by Tipper et al. 10 , described attentional effects using distractor-target combinations which demonstrated spatial-and arm-specific biases during reaching. Later studies investigating distractor-target perturbations extended this work by providing evidence of similar processes in prehension [11][12][13][14] . It is noteworthy that even though the behavioural consequences of affordances may be related to attentional mechanisms, these effects are behaviourally separable to visuospatial attention. Indeed, they are present even when the object is irrelevant to the task 2 and when visuospatial attention is directed away from the object [15][16][17] .Further work on the nature of affordance effects suggests that affordances can trigger motor representations 18,19 . Studies in...