2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the implementation of clinical pharmacy services for hospitalized patients: A mixed-methods systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Onozato and colleagues highlighted the importance of both administrative and political support in the implementation of clinical pharmacy services within health care institutions. 25 Unfortunately, clinical pharmacists seem to be trapped in a catch-22 situation: While individual clinical pharmacists can and want to deliver pharmaceutical care to patients, this lack of support hampers their ability to do so. On the other hand, without being able to demonstrate the need for their presence in direct patient care, clinical pharmacists lose the opportunity to gain said support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Onozato and colleagues highlighted the importance of both administrative and political support in the implementation of clinical pharmacy services within health care institutions. 25 Unfortunately, clinical pharmacists seem to be trapped in a catch-22 situation: While individual clinical pharmacists can and want to deliver pharmaceutical care to patients, this lack of support hampers their ability to do so. On the other hand, without being able to demonstrate the need for their presence in direct patient care, clinical pharmacists lose the opportunity to gain said support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors identi ed in the study were classi ed by two researchers (KSSR and SCS), according to the Apoteca framework, which comprises the following domains: "attitudinal", "political", "technical", and "administrative". This conceptual framework emerged from systematic observation and immersion of our research group (LEPFS, UFS) in the implementation of CPS in various settings within the Brazilian Health System [20,21]. The aforementioned domains are de ned as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation process will be based on the Methodology of Problematization with Maguerez Arc in association with the Apoteca framework [20,21]. This methodology has ve steps: observation of reality, key points, theorizing, solution hypotheses, and application to reality [22,23].…”
Section: Study Context and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution hypotheses were divided into four groups: political interventions (referring to the characteristic of influencing individuals or groups); administrative interventions (related to the organization and management process); technical interventions (referring to the development of skills and knowledge necessary for the development of CPS); and attitudinal interventions (related to behaviour, action or reaction, motivated by a feeling, or opinion for a particular fact or person) based on the Apoteca framework 47,48 . All the selected solution hypotheses were agreed upon the members of the implementation team, pharmacists and managers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the interventions to reality began at different times and persisted throughout the CPS implementation process. The interventions were based on the Apoteca framework, which presents four domains: Attitudinal, POlitical, TEChnical and Administrative (APOTECA) 47,48 . The interventions were described as follows: Political (this domain is related to the relationships within a group or organization that allow particular individuals or groups to influence others).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%