2016
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1258679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors That Influence Employees’ Security Policy Compliance: An Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature has documented many awareness programs where various SETA programs are proposed for the purpose of increasing employees' security awareness which promote ISP compliance among employees within organizations (e.g. Yoo et al, 2018;Barlow et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Burns et al, 2018). We assert that SETA programs have two essential partsthe underpinning part and the organization-specific part.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The literature has documented many awareness programs where various SETA programs are proposed for the purpose of increasing employees' security awareness which promote ISP compliance among employees within organizations (e.g. Yoo et al, 2018;Barlow et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Burns et al, 2018). We assert that SETA programs have two essential partsthe underpinning part and the organization-specific part.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to (Li et al 2019), they note that their colleagues' behaviour influences employees' behaviour in the field of cyber security as internal or external motivators. In organizational cyber security context, people usually tend to behave as their co-workers and friends (Chen, Chen, and Wu 2018;D'Arcy and Greene 2014;Donalds and Osei-Bryson 2020). In (Li et al 2019), the author's proposed Cues to action is an antecedent to cyber security behaviour, and cyber security behaviour directly leads to cyber security compliance, and 'use behaviour' is a significant construct of UTAUT2 model.…”
Section: Social Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous literature, the operationalization of the three elements presented in the AMC model has differed considerably. This is due, in part, to the examination of differing organizational competitive elements including but not limited to innovation and product strategy (i.e., Chen, Tribbitt, Yang, & Li, 2017), inventory performance (i.e., Udenio et al, 2018), engagement with environmental alliances (Stadtler & Lin, 2017), and employee compliance (i.e., Chen, Chen, & Wu, 2018). The cross‐disciplinary nature of the model encourages diversity in the conceptualization of the constructs.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%