Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: an empirical study in the telecommunications industry

Abstract

Abstract-Understanding the communication process in product development organizations has been recognized as a key element to improve product development performance. It is particularly interesting to study information exchanges in geographically distributed product development teams because of the highly interdependent nature of design organizations. Additionally, the use of electronic-based communication media has changed how development teams communicate. By studying the way product development teams use various communication media (face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail), we assess how the process of exchanging technical information is influenced by factors such as geographic dispersion, organizational bonds, and degree of team interdependence. We present a model that allows us to formulate several hypotheses about how these factors influence both communication frequency and media choice. We use empirical evidence from the telecommunications industry to test our hypotheses. We confirm previous results about the obstructive influence of distance on technical communication. However, we found that such negative effects may be mitigated by other factors such as the recognizing of highly interdependent team members, the existence of strong organizational bonds, and the use of electronic communication media.

Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit

“…On the one hand, the positive relationship between task interdependence and KMS usage is consistent with results of Sosa et al's study [71], suggesting that rational self-interest plays a critical role in information sharing. It is really hard for an individual to complete a job all by his/her own knowledge.…”

So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams

“…As a result, team members must rely more heavily on communication technologies, despite the increased interpretation challenges that can accompany the lower richness of e-mail, phone, or other substitute communication media (Daft & Lengel, 1984;Sosa, Eppinger, Pich, McKendrick, & Stout, 2002).…”

“…We measured geographic dispersion with a seven-point scale that captures increasing levels of physical separation (1=same room, 2=different room on the same hallway, 3=different hallway, 4=different floor, 5=different building, 6=different city, 7=different country; Allen, 1977;Olson & Olson, 1999;Sosa et al, 2002;Levin & Cross, 2004). Team members indicated the extent to which they were physically separated from every other member of the team.…”

Towards management of challenges in the innovation process: a case study on the application of the interface assessment tool

“…This separation may concern geographical but also (inter-and intra-) organizational separation of technology development, product development, and production activities (IANSITI, 1995). Exchange of technical information can be negatively influenced due to cultural, language and time zone differences (SOSA et al, 2002).…”