2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iea.2019.8715074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors to Consider in the Design of Plastic Packaging Intended for Reuse of Consumers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we add knowledge on the design of dispensers, while prior studies have focused on reusable packaging (e.g. Long et al, 2022;Madria and Tangsoc, 2019). Our study revealed that by having a novel appearance, dispensers could trigger consumers' exploration.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, we add knowledge on the design of dispensers, while prior studies have focused on reusable packaging (e.g. Long et al, 2022;Madria and Tangsoc, 2019). Our study revealed that by having a novel appearance, dispensers could trigger consumers' exploration.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, Lindh et al (2016) identify packaging size, colour, information, packaging open and reseal features are key attributes. Consumers are driven to reuse by packaging aspects rather than packaging contents (Greenwood et al, 2021) and if the packaging is useful to the consumer, the consumer will reuse the packaging (Madria and Tangsoc, 2019). In terms of aesthetic design, greater emphasis on aesthetics which can increase consumer-producer attachment (Kunamaneni et al, 2019).…”
Section: Social Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…),Bortolini et al (2018),Cleary (2013),Coelho et al (2020),Ertz et al (2017),Escario et al (2020),Fuentes et al (2019),Greenwood et al (2021), Grimes-Casey et al (2007,Hekkert et al (2000b),Kunamaneni et al (2019);Lisińska-Kuśnierz (2001),Langley et al (2011), Lialiuk et al (2019,Lindh et al (2016),Long et al (2020),Madria and Tangsoc (2019), McCarthy (1993), McGlynn et al (2003a), McGlynn et al (2003b,Muranko et al (2020),Muranko et al (2021),Ratnichkina et al (2021),Tassell and Aurisicchio (2020),Tsiliyannis (2008),Wascher and Barcia (1996) Primary refillableFerrara and Plourde (2003),Lofthouse and Bhamra (2006),Lofthouse (2007),Lofthouse et al (2009),Lofthouse et al (2017), Mills et al (2018,Nessi et al (2014),Nessi et al (2015),Numata and Managi (2012), Sujai and Juwana (2021) Primary returnableCopeland et al (2013),Doorsselaer and Lox (1999), Rasmussen (1984) Secondary/tertiary returnable Accorsi et al (2020), Accorsi et al (2014), Accorsi et al (2022), Afif et al (2007), Afif et al (2009), Atamer et al (2013), Baruffaldi et al (2019), Böröcz (2022), Camps-Posino et al (…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%