Factors underlying suboptimal diagnostic performance in physicians under time pressure

Abstract

CONTEXT Time pressure has been implicated in the suboptimal diagnostic performance of doctors and in increases in diagnostic errors. However, the reasons underlying these effects are not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of time pressure on physicians' diagnostic accuracy and to explore the mediating effects of perceived stress (emotional pathway) and number of plausible diagnostic hypotheses (cognitive pathway) on the proposed relationship.METHODS We conducted a randomised controlled experiment. A total of 75 senior internal medicine residents completed eight written clinical cases under conditions with (n = 40) or without (n = 35) time pressure. They were then asked to: (i) rate the overall stress experienced, and (ii) write down any alternative hypotheses they had thought of when diagnosing the cases. In a post hoc analysis, a mediation path analysis was performed to test the causal relationships between time pressure, perceived stress and number of alternative diagnoses. RESULTSParticipants who were under time pressure spent less time diagnosing the cases (85.54 seconds versus 181.81 seconds; p< 0.001) and had a lower mean diagnostic accuracy score (0.44 versus 0.53; p = 0.01). In addition, they reported more stress (5.80 versus 4.69; p = 0.01) and generated fewer plausible tentative hypotheses (0.37 versus 0.51; p = 0.01). Two path coefficients were found to be statistically significant; the first path coefficient referred to the relationship between time pressure and perceived stress (standardised b = 0.25, p = 0.029), and the second negative path coefficient referred to the relationship between time pressure and number of plausible alternative hypotheses (standardised b = À0.32, p< 0.01).CONCLUSIONS Time pressure adversely influences physicians' diagnostic accuracy by increasing their stress response and reducing the number of plausible hypotheses as mediators.

Health Surveillance Problem in the Workplace: A Case Report

“…Bu durum hasta hekim ilişkisini olumsuz yönde etkileyerek klinik değerlendirmenin tam olarak yapılamamasına, tanı ve tedavide hata olasılığını arttırabilir. Bu koşulların da olgumuzun bu kadar geç tanı almasının nedenlerinden birisini oluşturduğunu söylemek yanlış olmayacaktır (10) .…”

Unravelling the polyphony in clinical reasoning research in medical education

“…There has been extensive research on the impact of separate contextual factors on medical judgement—individual patient characteristics—such as race, gender, social class or patient behaviour, 94‐99 physician characteristics and cultural stereotypes, 100‐102 case ambiguity, 103,104 and time pressure 105‐107 . While these social and other external factors surely represent the context, none of them in isolation can incorporate the entire meaning of the context.…”

Factors Related to Self-Reported Distress Experienced by Physicians During Their First COVID-19 Triage Decisions

“…While many factors contribute to the level of distress experienced by physicians when faced with making clinical decisions, such as experience, expertise, time pressures and clinical setting, [19][20][21][22][23] it remains imperative to determine if JiTT and the use of clinical guidelines (both helpful in providing physicians with more information as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds) are associated with reduced levels of physician distress when it comes to making COVID-19-related triage decisions. Our study aims to assess factors, such as COVID-19-related JiTT and clinical guidelines, associated with distress experienced by physicians during their first COVID-19 triage decisions.…”