2022
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2119401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure to confirm the factor structure of the CEBRACS: An assessment of food and alcohol disturbance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research group has previously validated the Italian version of the CEBRACS [25] in the same sample used for this analysis, showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.886) and concurrent validity using a 5-factor model. It should be noted that since the publishing of our work, research on other samples with confirmatory factor analysis was not able to replicate consistently any factor solution [29,30]. For the purpose of this paper, the presence of FAD was reported if participants scored at least 1 item ≥ 2.…”
Section: Food and Alcohol Disturbance (Fad)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our research group has previously validated the Italian version of the CEBRACS [25] in the same sample used for this analysis, showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.886) and concurrent validity using a 5-factor model. It should be noted that since the publishing of our work, research on other samples with confirmatory factor analysis was not able to replicate consistently any factor solution [29,30]. For the purpose of this paper, the presence of FAD was reported if participants scored at least 1 item ≥ 2.…”
Section: Food and Alcohol Disturbance (Fad)mentioning
confidence: 93%