2014
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3952-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False Negative Cytology in Large Thyroid Nodules

Abstract: When referred for thyroidectomy, patients with large thyroid nodules demonstrate a modest, yet significant, false-negative rate despite initial benign aspiration cytology. Therefore, thyroid nodules ≥3 cm may be considered for removal even when referred with benign preoperative cytology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
63
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no difference in risk of malignancy was noted when a cut-off of 3 cm was used. Giles et al [16] evaluated the accuracy of benign FNAC in patients who underwent surgery for nodules 3 cm or larger. The patient cohort included patients with thyroid nodules measuring 3 cm or larger, with benign FNAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, no difference in risk of malignancy was noted when a cut-off of 3 cm was used. Giles et al [16] evaluated the accuracy of benign FNAC in patients who underwent surgery for nodules 3 cm or larger. The patient cohort included patients with thyroid nodules measuring 3 cm or larger, with benign FNAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some surgeons recommend thyroidectomy for nodules ≥4 cm even in the setting of benign FNAC, due to increased risk of malignancy and increased false negative rates in large thyroid nodules [12131415]. Even more aggressive surgeons use a threshold of 3 cm [16]. This increase in false negative rates with large thyroid nodules is thought to be due to sampling error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding patients with a primary TN smaller than 0.5 cm 27 (3), and those who did not have a preoperative FNAB performed and/or reviewed within our institution (15), 297 patients with 326 distinct primary TNs who met the inclusion criteria for this study remained for analysis. Our sample comprised 233 women and 64 men, a ratio of 3.6:1.0.…”
Section: Patient Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for nodules with suspicious US features or increase in size during follow-up, even after benign cytology, repeat FNA is recommended to prevent delayed diagnosis of malignancy from possible false-negative FNA results [6,7]. Meanwhile, for large lesions, until now, the relationship between size and false-negative cytology remains controversial [813] and US features have yet to have an established role in predicting false-negative cytology for these large lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%