2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0263-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False positive 18F-FDG PET/CT due to gynaecomastia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 66 68 Unilateral nodular gynecomastia with increased FDG uptake may mimic a primary or secondary tumor. 69 When interpreting FDG PET/CT as a staging tool in oncological male patients, one should consider gynecomastia as a possible cause for increased FDG uptake in the breast.…”
Section: Diseases Of the Male Breastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 66 68 Unilateral nodular gynecomastia with increased FDG uptake may mimic a primary or secondary tumor. 69 When interpreting FDG PET/CT as a staging tool in oncological male patients, one should consider gynecomastia as a possible cause for increased FDG uptake in the breast.…”
Section: Diseases Of the Male Breastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few authors have reported gynecomastia as a possible cause of false-positive imaging on FDG PET-CT studies, which may be considered in cases presenting with FDG uptake in the breast. 8 9 However, given the presence of a soft tissue mass in the breast on CT images coupled with tracer uptake, the possibility of a metastatic deposit or a second primary needed to be excluded. This was done using mammography, US, and ultimately a biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDG PET/CT findings of the sclerosing adenosis have been rarely reported. This case indicates sclerosing adenosis can show increased FDG uptake and should be included in the differential diagnosis of focal breast FDG accumulation along with nonmalignant and malignant conditions, including gynecomastia, 9 mastitis, 10 fat necrosis, 10 fibroadenoma, 10,11 intraductal papilloma, 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 10 breast carcinoma, 10,12 angiosarcoma, 13 lymphoma, 14,15 and metastasis 13,16 …”
mentioning
confidence: 88%